Fusing 104 COE rods

This is the main board for discussing general techniques, tools, and processes for fusing, slumping, and related kiln-forming activities.

Moderators: Brad Walker, Tony Smith

Post Reply
AmySkewed
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:53 pm
Location: Chicago Area
Contact:

Fusing 104 COE rods

Post by AmySkewed »

HI Everyone,

I have a friend who does lampwork and we are trying to figure out what to do with all the short leftovers she has. I would like to fuse them into a platter, but am struggling with finding both a schedule and insuring compatibility. I realize that 104 needs less heat than 90, but I seem to have pieces that are cracking on the way down more often. I slowed down my schedule and while the results are getting better I still get far more cracking than I would expect with 90.
From a compatibility standpoint I feel like 104 is not necessarily compatible with other 104. I realize that 90 and 96 are tested for compatibility... are other COEs really just an approximation?

Any help would be appreciated!

Thanks
The Hobbyist
Posts: 308
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 7:09 pm
Location: Sun City West (NW Phoenix), AZ
Contact:

Re: Fusing 104 COE rods

Post by The Hobbyist »

I'm surprised she doesn't just attach the short(s) to the end of a clear rod. That's what I do. There will always be a very small amount left that will be wasted.

Jim
"With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil—that takes religion. " Steven Weinberg
Stephen Richard
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 4:36 pm
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Contact:

Re: Fusing 104 COE rods

Post by Stephen Richard »

AmySkewed wrote:HI Everyone,

I have a friend who does lampwork and we are trying to figure out what to do with all the short leftovers she has. I would like to fuse them into a platter, but am struggling with finding both a schedule and insuring compatibility. I realize that 104 needs less heat than 90, but I seem to have pieces that are cracking on the way down more often. I slowed down my schedule and while the results are getting better I still get far more cracking than I would expect with 90.
From a compatibility standpoint I feel like 104 is not necessarily compatible with other 104. I realize that 90 and 96 are tested for compatibility... are other COEs really just an approximation?

Any help would be appreciated!

Thanks
CoE does not equal compatibility. It has been mentioned many times on this list.
This http://glasstips.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/coe.html is a brief note. The Bullseye site, education section has a much fuller discussion.
As spherical things can withstand much more stress than flat ones, compatibility is not such a big problem for lampworkers.
It seems you should undertake some compatibility tests on these pieces. http://glasstips.blogspot.co.uk/2009/08 ... tests.html
Steve Richard
You can view my Blog at: http://verrier-glass.blogspot.com/
Post Reply