Thanks
anea

Moderators: Brad Walker, Tony Smith
AneaAnea wrote:OKay all, I have been searching through the archives for a couple of days now, and think that I have enough information to start playing with this glass. I am used to 90 coe BE or UB, but have a friend who wants to enhance his projects that use float so I am ready to experiment. I am picking up free scrap from a window shop at 1pm. Just wanted to see if there was any extra advice you would give to someone playing with this glass for the first time?
Thanks
anea
Did you also use float glass as a base for this? I am a bit confused. Are glass bottles such as those for Vodka considered float glass? Sorry but I just don't quite get it. Are they compatible for the most part?tom suter wrote:I have been playing with float myself and have had good luck as far as fusing but more problems annealing. I done a arch 18" wide 12 " high 1/4" layer with sky Blue Vodka bottles crushed up with a green bottle crushed and mixed up. It came out really nice but I ended going up to 1600 to get the frit to fuse smooth. But did get devit but it looks okay on this project. It was a peacock the arch was the feathers spread and then I tacked on a 1/4" body on top.
AneaAnea wrote:Did you also use float glass as a base for this? I am a bit confused. Are glass bottles such as those for Vodka considered float glass? Sorry but I just don't quite get it. Are they compatible for the most part?tom suter wrote:I have been playing with float myself and have had good luck as far as fusing but more problems annealing. I done a arch 18" wide 12 " high 1/4" layer with sky Blue Vodka bottles crushed up with a green bottle crushed and mixed up. It came out really nice but I ended going up to 1600 to get the frit to fuse smooth. But did get devit but it looks okay on this project. It was a peacock the arch was the feathers spread and then I tacked on a 1/4" body on top.
anea
AneaAnea wrote:Okay I got the pieces out of the kiln this morning and they luckily did not crack violently. They were so small only 1 and 1/2 inches square, so I am guessing that is why I didn't have any cracking problems.
The one with the copper on the bottom layer of float with two layers of float over it devitrified a bit. Its wrinkly and foggy looking but I have seen much worse devit. It looks like it only tack fused, there are clearly still three different pieces of glass. The funny thing is, the way it pulled in on the top layer. Its almost like there was a weight or something in the middle of the top piece of glass the way it sucked in and sunk down. It almost has a lip of thinner glass all the way around, never seen anything like it.
The one with two layers of float and then a copper spiral with one layer of float on top did not devit. It too is only tack fused and it did that same weird suck into the middle from the sides thing.
The one with one layer of float, then copper, then float and another spiral and then one layer of float on top, did not really devit either. It too is only tacked and did the same weird sucky in thingy.
I am thinking that I am going to lay up the glass and copper the same way tonight but hold it way longer at 1560 so that maybe it will full fuse instead of just tack, maybe hold for and hour or 90 minutes. What do you guys think? I am also going to use an overspray, if I have some, I never use the stuff so I am not sure if I have any at home. Am very tempted to use the same annealing schedule since I made it out okay, should I press my luck? Remember these are very small pieces.
Thanks everyone-
I enjoy learning from this board and these great people![]()
Anea
AneaAnea wrote:Okay I got the pieces out of the kiln this morning and they luckily did not crack violently. They were so small only 1 and 1/2 inches square, so I am guessing that is why I didn't have any cracking problems.
The one with the copper on the bottom layer of float with two layers of float over it devitrified a bit. Its wrinkly and foggy looking but I have seen much worse devit. It looks like it only tack fused, there are clearly still three different pieces of glass. The funny thing is, the way it pulled in on the top layer. Its almost like there was a weight or something in the middle of the top piece of glass the way it sucked in and sunk down. It almost has a lip of thinner glass all the way around, never seen anything like it.
The one with two layers of float and then a copper spiral with one layer of float on top did not devit. It too is only tack fused and it did that same weird suck into the middle from the sides thing.
The one with one layer of float, then copper, then float and another spiral and then one layer of float on top, did not really devit either. It too is only tacked and did the same weird sucky in thingy.
I am thinking that I am going to lay up the glass and copper the same way tonight but hold it way longer at 1560 so that maybe it will full fuse instead of just tack, maybe hold for and hour or 90 minutes. What do you guys think? I am also going to use an overspray, if I have some, I never use the stuff so I am not sure if I have any at home. Am very tempted to use the same annealing schedule since I made it out okay, should I press my luck? Remember these are very small pieces.
Thanks everyone-
I enjoy learning from this board and these great people![]()
Anea
Thanks Bert-Bert Weiss wrote:AneaAnea wrote:Okay I got the pieces out of the kiln this morning and they luckily did not crack violently. They were so small only 1 and 1/2 inches square, so I am guessing that is why I didn't have any cracking problems.
The one with the copper on the bottom layer of float with two layers of float over it devitrified a bit. Its wrinkly and foggy looking but I have seen much worse devit. It looks like it only tack fused, there are clearly still three different pieces of glass. The funny thing is, the way it pulled in on the top layer. Its almost like there was a weight or something in the middle of the top piece of glass the way it sucked in and sunk down. It almost has a lip of thinner glass all the way around, never seen anything like it.
The one with two layers of float and then a copper spiral with one layer of float on top did not devit. It too is only tack fused and it did that same weird suck into the middle from the sides thing.
The one with one layer of float, then copper, then float and another spiral and then one layer of float on top, did not really devit either. It too is only tacked and did the same weird sucky in thingy.
I am thinking that I am going to lay up the glass and copper the same way tonight but hold it way longer at 1560 so that maybe it will full fuse instead of just tack, maybe hold for and hour or 90 minutes. What do you guys think? I am also going to use an overspray, if I have some, I never use the stuff so I am not sure if I have any at home. Am very tempted to use the same annealing schedule since I made it out okay, should I press my luck? Remember these are very small pieces.
Thanks everyone-
I enjoy learning from this board and these great people![]()
Anea
You can pick whatever time you like, but you will never anneal float glass at 970. I soak at 1000. Graham soaks at 1030.
The temperature at which glass reacts is a bit unique to each style of kiln. It has to do with the interplay between time and temperature. I never fire above 1500 in my big kiln or my medium kiln, but you might have very different results.
I can't stress enough how important a slump test is for EVERY fuser. Do a slump test and soak 100º below slump temp. Directions are in Lundstrom Fusing Book 1 or in the WGBB archives. This test will assure you the right annealing soak temperature in your kiln with your thermcouple and controller.
Annealing off the mark is a terrible waste of time and energy.
2 do this correctly U need 2 go up slow I think its 50f hourBert Weiss wrote:AneaAnea wrote:Okay I got the pieces out of the kiln this morning and they luckily did not crack violently. They were so small only 1 and 1/2 inches square, so I am guessing that is why I didn't have any cracking problems.
The one with the copper on the bottom layer of float with two layers of float over it devitrified a bit. Its wrinkly and foggy looking but I have seen much worse devit. It looks like it only tack fused, there are clearly still three different pieces of glass. The funny thing is, the way it pulled in on the top layer. Its almost like there was a weight or something in the middle of the top piece of glass the way it sucked in and sunk down. It almost has a lip of thinner glass all the way around, never seen anything like it.
The one with two layers of float and then a copper spiral with one layer of float on top did not devit. It too is only tack fused and it did that same weird suck into the middle from the sides thing.
The one with one layer of float, then copper, then float and another spiral and then one layer of float on top, did not really devit either. It too is only tacked and did the same weird sucky in thingy.
I am thinking that I am going to lay up the glass and copper the same way tonight but hold it way longer at 1560 so that maybe it will full fuse instead of just tack, maybe hold for and hour or 90 minutes. What do you guys think? I am also going to use an overspray, if I have some, I never use the stuff so I am not sure if I have any at home. Am very tempted to use the same annealing schedule since I made it out okay, should I press my luck? Remember these are very small pieces.
Thanks everyone-
I enjoy learning from this board and these great people![]()
Anea
You can pick whatever time you like, but you will never anneal float glass at 970. I soak at 1000. Graham soaks at 1030.
The temperature at which glass reacts is a bit unique to each style of kiln. It has to do with the interplay between time and temperature. I never fire above 1500 in my big kiln or my medium kiln, but you might have very different results.
I can't stress enough how important a slump test is for EVERY fuser. Do a slump test and soak 100º below slump temp. Directions are in Lundstrom Fusing Book 1 or in the WGBB archives. This test will assure you the right annealing soak temperature in your kiln with your thermcouple and controller.
Annealing off the mark is a terrible waste of time and energy.
I am not at home this week so I don't have my data handy. Brian, you are really the expert about annealing thick chunks. I'm good with big slabs up to 1.5" thick.Brian and Jenny Blanthorn wrote:
2 do this correctly U need 2 go up slow I think its 50f hour
This right Bert ???
This is from PeteBert Weiss wrote:Brian and Jenny Blanthorn wrote:
2 do this correctly U need 2 go up slow I think its 50f hour
This right Bert ???