COE of non-tested BE?
Moderators: Brad Walker, Tony Smith
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 10:27 am
- Location: Boulder, CO
COE of non-tested BE?
I have a bunch of scrap BE that I'd like to use for fusing. Does the non-tested BE tend to be COE90, or is it more random? Specifically I'm looking at 0301 (pink opal) but also wondering in general.
(I know, I should test it myself ... but the magless deadline is getting
closer!)
Thanks -- Marilyn
(I know, I should test it myself ... but the magless deadline is getting
closer!)
Thanks -- Marilyn
-
- Posts: 382
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 8:10 pm
- Location: Washington DC Metropolitan Area
- Contact:
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 9:33 pm
- Location: North Carolina, USA
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 10:27 am
- Location: Boulder, CO
-
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 4:06 pm
- Location: Helios Kiln Glass Studio - Austin
- Contact:
Re: COE of non-tested BE?
The way it was explained to me is that compatible and non-compatible glass will come from the same run. The glass that tests compatible is labeled and sold such.Marilyn Kaminski wrote:I have a bunch of scrap BE that I'd like to use for fusing. Does the non-tested BE tend to be COE90, or is it more random? Specifically I'm looking at 0301 (pink opal) but also wondering in general.
(I know, I should test it myself ... but the magless deadline is getting
closer!)
Thanks -- Marilyn
If that's true, then the implication is that the glass not labeled compatible is unlikely to fit COE 90 because it actually tested not compatible.
Someone from BE would need to verify this. I can't remember who told me...or if, perhaps, I dreamed it.
- Paul
-
- Posts: 1037
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2003 5:59 pm
- Location: Massachusetts, USA
- Contact:
Re: COE of non-tested BE?
Maybe not. What is their criteria for "not-compatible"? Don't they test every tenth sheet? If so, then adjacent sheets might be compatible and not-compatible.Paul Tarlow wrote:If that's true, then the implication is that the glass not labeled compatible is unlikely to fit COE 90 because it actually tested not compatible.- Paul
Tony
The tightrope between being strange and being creative is too narrow to walk without occasionally landing on both sides..." Scott Berkun
Re: COE of non-tested BE?
That's right Paul.Paul Tarlow wrote:The way it was explained to me is that compatible and non-compatible glass will come from the same run. The glass that tests compatible is labeled and sold such.Marilyn Kaminski wrote:I have a bunch of scrap BE that I'd like to use for fusing. Does the non-tested BE tend to be COE90, or is it more random? Specifically I'm looking at 0301 (pink opal) but also wondering in general.
(I know, I should test it myself ... but the magless deadline is getting
closer!)
Thanks -- Marilyn
If that's true, then the implication is that the glass not labeled compatible is unlikely to fit COE 90 because it actually tested not compatible.
Someone from BE would need to verify this. I can't remember who told me...or if, perhaps, I dreamed it.
- Paul
Out of a days production, which is all tested every 10 sheets . . .
Compatible is compatible..
Non-compatible is non-compatible.
I think Bullseye would love to make EVERY sheet compatible, it commands a higher price, but the start of a run (10 - 20%?) and the end of the run (another 20%+?) are not compatible, for whatever glass chemistry reason. Go by the labels. Simple really. Brock
My memory is so good, I can't remember the last time I forgot something . . .
Just as an aside, I work for a chemical plant. We produce one product that is sold at one price to one market, but we sell the exact same product (NO additives) at a much higher price, but to a different market. We can do this legally because they're sold to different markets.
Gambling on this logic, I ordered approx. $1K of untested BE and found that all was compatible. The drawback is I still have to do the testing.
...Kelly
Gambling on this logic, I ordered approx. $1K of untested BE and found that all was compatible. The drawback is I still have to do the testing.
...Kelly
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 10:27 am
- Location: Boulder, CO
The reason that they only test every nth sheet is that they are looking for the change from compatible to non-compatible or the reverse. The premise here -- and it must be a good one because you don't hear any complaining about getting non-compatible glass marked as compatible -- is that if the 50th sheet and the 60th sheet are both compatible then sheets 51 - 59 are also compatble.But now I've learned that they only test 1-in-10, so if I see a sheet that's got that distinctive corner-cut but isn't marked compatible, I'll definitely know to NOT pick that sheet.
- Paul
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 11:39 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
- Contact: