I saw that and was so glad that something in our medium made it in and something great too. By my count, if you don't include casting, there were 6 or 7 pieces out of 100 that were in the kilnworking area. Kind of a low number. Gee if I had only known that all I had to do was get naked and strap pieces of glass to my personals and take a picture to get in I so would be in there! Since I wouldn't want to repeat anyone's work I think next year I'll try and find a great big test tube for my husband and get out the camera...
-A
Amy on Salt Spring wrote:I saw that and was so glad that something in our medium made it in and something great too. By my count, if you don't include casting, there were 6 or 7 pieces out of 100 that were in the kilnworking area. Kind of a low number. Gee if I had only known that all I had to do was get naked and strap pieces of glass to my personals and take a picture to get in I so would be in there! Since I wouldn't want to repeat anyone's work I think next year I'll try and find a great big test tube for my husband and get out the camera...
-A
The last time the topic of New Glass Review came up, Brock said the work had to have "content". So I guess glass undies on someone and husbands in giant test tubes would be considered having CONTENT.
That's more content than most of the work.... Congratulations to Susan though.... a portent that the jury is perhaps acquiring some taste. Or knowledge. Now that I've put that in print, I suppose I'll have to submit under an assumed name next go-round! Just call me John Galt.
The last time the topic of New Glass Review came up, Brock said the work had to have "content". So I guess glass undies on someone and husbands in giant test tubes would be considered having CONTENT.
Ron[/quote]
Ron, depends on which syllable of "content" you want to emphasize.... - Barbara
Ron Coleman wrote:Just got my copy of New Glass Review 24 and on page 9 is Susan Taylor Glasgow's entry "Stylish Comfort". Congratulations Susan, very nice work.