ANYONE!darenest wrote:Is this challenge open to anyone of just the professionals here?
Darci
Koan - It's only a clique if you think it is - Master Bobo
Moderators: Brad Walker, Tony Smith
ANYONE!darenest wrote:Is this challenge open to anyone of just the professionals here?
Darci
LOL tony, i just returned from a bead show, am so tired i can barely keep my eyes open or coordinate the fingers and this thread has now caught my attention - if you need color holler! i've got plenty i need to think on no color, no dichro and soemthing...Tony Smith wrote:I'm in... now I have to figure how to do a piece with no sandblasting, no texture and bright colors.... hmmmm
Tony
This is a good idea. Lots of us are familiar with each others work but I'm willing to bet not all and without the original for comparison unless one know's the reference point, it's difficult to appreciate the journey one took to the opposite.heruviva wrote:Show every participant's typical work versus the non typical - i.e. the project.
You could make an exhibition out of all of these - a virtual exhibition on the web, or a real one - in life
GASP..... I'm having major anxiety thinking of some way to use dichro... along with the gold leaf. Eeeeeeeeeeek!dee wrote:LOL tony, i just returned from a bead show, am so tired i can barely keep my eyes open or coordinate the fingers and this thread has now caught my attention - if you need color holler! i've got plenty i need to think on no color, no dichro and soemthing...Tony Smith wrote:I'm in... now I have to figure how to do a piece with no sandblasting, no texture and bright colors.... hmmmm
Tony
D
It's a great idea, to have some sort of show with these pieces, (assuming that they actually get made) but finding a venue for this type of vanity show will be difficult, if not impossible.Phil Hoppes wrote:This is a good idea. Lots of us are familiar with each others work but I'm willing to bet not all and without the original for comparison unless one know's the reference point, it's difficult to appreciate the journey one took to the opposite.heruviva wrote:Show every participant's typical work versus the non typical - i.e. the project.
You could make an exhibition out of all of these - a virtual exhibition on the web, or a real one - in life
Everbodys thoughts?
Phil
I think Chip did all the work, so if there's gonna be another calendar, someone has to take Chip's place. Are you gonna do it? BrockDani wrote:I think if it happens again under the Warmglass banner, it should be completely in Brad's control. After all, the final product reflects on him more than upon the rest of us. Your thoughts, Brad?
Actually, no, I didn't see the question. Didn't see this thread either. Just came to check it out because someone warned me that I'd been volunteered.Jackie Beckman wrote:By the way Brad, did you see the question about where and when you'd like pieces sent for those choosing to donate theirs to the auction?
I would never want to cause you any extra work, Brad, especially at the time of year when you're getting ready for the WGW. I just figured that the auction is a yearly event at the WGW anyway, isn't it? And these would just be added into whatever you already had planned for the auction. There are about 23 interested people (so far) and I'm sure only about half will want to actually part with their "Alter-Creation" so I just figured they could send them to wherever you planned on having the rest of the pieces sent.Brad Walker wrote:Actually, no, I didn't see the question. Didn't see this thread either. Just came to check it out because someone warned me that I'd been volunteered.Jackie Beckman wrote:By the way Brad, did you see the question about where and when you'd like pieces sent for those choosing to donate theirs to the auction?
It's a bit early to give out an address for auction donations, but I'll get one out this July/August. It'll most likely either be the hotel or my address in Clemmons, depending on how much the hotel charges to store stuff.
I have no problem with posting photos of finished work online, but do have a problem with spending a lot of time organizing an event like this. If someone wants to take the lead on it (kind of like the magnet exchange or Chip's calendar, where we have a clear central figure), I'm willing to help.
But not coordinate! Someone else will have to do that.
I'm going to bow out of this... I just got a great commission that will keep me plenty busy until Fall... and Russian iconography is enough of a change from my usual style to be plenty challenging! Cheerio!Jackie Beckman wrote:Here is an updated list. Remember, if you don't want to be on it and you are, let me know. Same applies if you want to join in. Just post it in this thread and I'll add your name.
1. Jackie
2 Brock
3. Barbara M
4. Lisa A
5. Havi
6. Dani
7. Linda R
8. Tony
9. Bert
10. Bill Z
11. Amy (Milwaukee)
12. Doc Steve
13. Cliff Swanson
14. Phil Hoppes
15. Ron C
16. Rosanna
17. Charlie S
18. Avery
19. Robin Z
20. Susan B
21. Darci
22. Dee
23. Annah James
I was hoping that when the pieces are finished and posted in the Photo section we would then be able to ask participants how their piece differed from their normal work, for those whose work we are unfamiler with. But, Phil and Bert have better ideas about posting both regular and alter photos of people's work. Now if we can just get Brad to go along with it, that would be great. By the way Brad, did you see the question about where and when you'd like pieces sent for those choosing to donate theirs to the auction?
Nope, no stress. And I'm all for auction donations.Jackie Beckman wrote:I hope this isn't something that has caused you any stress. All I can see it doing, as far as your part is concerned, is having a dozen or so more items to include in the auction. If you rather we just post pictures rather than donate the pieces, naturally, that is up to you.
Meanwhile, wherever they end up, lets all keep thinking about what we're going to do for this challenge - it's a great project for learning and expanding your horizons no matter where the pieces go.